Friday, August 31, 2012

Digital Media Convergence-Advertising and New Media- Mikaela Heise


Digital Media Convergence- Advertising and New Media.

Mikaela Heise: 42867584 



The contemporary mass proliferation of technological capabilities and the propagation of content consumption have provided the impetus for a new revolution of converged digital media. This digital media convergence is distinguished as the merging or coadaptation of multiple media forms, industries, cultures and practices towards performing similar tasks (Jenkins, 2006). Situated within the broader cultural context of an increasingly digitally reliant society, the paradigm shift towards new and converged media has exponentially challenged the comfortable practices of advertising through traditional media. In turn, a shift in the dynamics between producer and consumer has led to a new age of participatory communication and media.


Vast technological convergence within the past decade has resulted in an unprecedented era of pluralised media that retains an omnipresent power over social behaviour. This fragmented media has resulted in a “splintered audience” (Khamis, 2012) which in turn has contributed to the decline of the television, and the subsequent obsolescence of T.V advertising. As discussed by Negroponte the progression from the physicality of analogue media to the digital sphere has made way for “ubiquitous and user-friendly” technologies that give rise to a new found sense of consumer independence. The introduction of digital television enabled the personalisation of program schedules, which in turn gave a greater sense of empowerment to audiences to navigate around commercialised content. However, with the emergence of new technological practices such as smart phone technology and more capabilities online, the conventional use and appeal of the television for sole entertainment purposes were lost. With the dramatic widening of technological practices, consumers are finding themselves pulled taught between multiply platforms of digital engagement. Under particular scrutiny, the rise of the participatory culture online, which enabled the sharing and uploading of content purely for entertainment value, provided substantial engagement. As discussed by Sheehan and Morrison “The ubiquity of wireless access makes it possible to never log on or off to the Internet”(Sheehan and Morrison, 2009). This new social obsession of being constantly connected had a detrimental effect on commercial television. The value of television advertising was inextricably linked to the relevance and popularity of the T.V set (Khamis, 2012). This conventional reliance upon the television was superseded by the explosion of the internet, prioritising advertisers to re-evaluate and revive the stasis nature of television advertising. As discussed by Dwyer, advertisers followed consumers online, “where competition for eyeballs and ad dollars is fierce.”(Kiehl, 2009).

                                                             'The death of television' 
                                             wordpress (2010) Untitled. [image online] Available at:   
http://drbristol.wordpress.com/2010/09/ 17/t-g-i-f-ten-tv-tips/ [Accessed: 28 august].                                                   



Faced with the overwhelming ubiquity of the internet, advertisers have had to adjust and adapt to a new era of consumer sovereignty. Accompanying the mass splintering of audiences and the subsequent decline in television consumption, the notion of consumer sovereignty emerged. As discussed by Spurgeon, the presumption of the geographically located audience is defunct. The widely held assumption that an audience’s location on the internet was dependent upon geographical positioning, and thus the ability to engage them, was naïve. The widening of bandwidths, eradication of broadcast restrictions and explosion in internet options through digital media convergence has forged new spaces which enable people to decide where, when and how they consume desired content (Deuze, 2006), regardless of geographical location or content restrictions. This new found fluidity has catalysed a power shift between the producer and the consumers of content, contrasting with “older notions of passive media spectatorship”(Jenkins, 2006). The modern consumer within the online environment is now king (Khamis, 2012), independent in choice and consumption. The rise of the participatory culture has further empowered consumers, as social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and Youtube, amongst other content sharing based sites, undermine the control of industry specific expertise. Now consumers control the means of production, distribution and consumption. This has engaged advertisers and corporations alike to reassess and revive strategies to overcome the obsolescence of traditional media advertising.

Proliferation in Social Network usage
Unknown. (2011) Social Media websites. [image online] Available at: http://watvhistory.com/2011/04/media-convergence-the-evolution-of-content-form-and-delivery/ [Accessed: 28 august].


Dissatisfied by the obsolescence of advertising through old media, advertisers looked for “new ways to reach increasingly distracted, distrustful and disinterested consumers.” (Spurgeon, 2008). Utilising the increasing usage of social media networks and exploiting the sheer social power of the current participatory culture, advertisers are “reaching millions, all on a shoestring marketing budget” (Watts et al, 2007). Viral marketing in relative terms is the low-budget production of content with marketed intent, launched on a social media website in the hope that peer to peer interaction and commentary will activate mass consumption. As discussed by Spurgeon, viral marketing wholly typifies the progression of advertising and new media into one synonymous entity. Validating this argument Spurgeon relies upon the case study of the Coke-Mentos experiments that “illuminate the co-adaptive development of advertising and media.”(Spurgeon, 2008). In 2006 hundreds of consumer produced videos of experiments involving exploding Diet Cokes and Mentos began appearing on websites such as Youtube and Revver. The mass replication, “video capture and Web-based sharing of Coke-Mentos experiments snowballed. Thousands of experiments were uploaded to the Web and viewed by millions.” (Spurgeon, 2008). The particular video exampled below received over 15 million views and appeared at the top of the ‘most watched’ lists, demanding unprecedented brand exposure for both Coke and Mentos.


'Diet Coke+ Mentos' experiment
Unknown. (2006) Diet Coke + Mentos. [video online] Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKoB0MHVBvM.


Mentos estimated this media exposure was worth “US$ 10 million, equivalent to more than half its annual advertising budget for the US market”(Spurgeon, 2008). As discussed by Dwyer the viral campaign provides a new economical determinist paradigm that is resource efficient in capturing consumer attention. Spurgeon further validates the technological determinism of viral campaigning:

“Convergent developments in consumer electronic barriers and social software that support peer to peer interaction also cause the economic barriers to media production and distribution to plummet” (Spurgeon, 2008).

This economically resourceful convergence of advertising and media further “facilitates the operation of neoliberal global markets” confirming the presence of media imperialism (Dwyer, 2010). This unexpected and unanticipated brand exposure, whilst rare, set into motion the rise of the viral campaign that has seen successful and unsuccessful replications of this viral phenomenon.

Cadbury’s immensely successful 2009 viral campaign “eyebrows” embodies this rising trend of the commercial utilisation of participatory media, to perpetuate branded content through social spheres. In response to the growing popularity of social networks, specifically Youtube, Cadbury set about to recreate the Coke-Mentos experiment phenomenon, capitalising off the success of their viral ‘Gorilla’ campaign. Exploiting new media practices of audio-visual manipulation, the advertisement converges digital special effects with film to satirically depict two children with eyebrows flamboyantly dancing to ‘Don’t stop the rock’ by Freestyle. Adopting a ‘Maddison and Vine’ approach (Spurgeon, 2007) the advertisement seductively wraps marketed material in a creative and subtle approach to engage consumers. The advertisement cut through the surrounding advertising noise of the time, attracting over 9 million views and a wealth of concentrated consumer engagement. Subsequent spin offs and parodies, including a Lily Allen parody, played a major role in reproposing the brand, re-embedding marketing messages and intensifying brand product association. This use of humour and creativity as a form of engagement confirms the effective use of the ‘Maddison and Vine’ approach, highlighting the industry conflict between informational advertising and creative advertising. As examined by Spurgeon, creative advertising is reflexive and more appropriate in the current climate of consumer sovereignty:

“The judgement that rational appeal is the lesser of the two evils of advertising is anchored by the assumption that consumers and media audiences are passive, and that perfect information in a market can really only be attained through rational, instrumental allocation” (Spurgeon, 2008)

Cadbury’s execution of creative advertising justifies the success of this paradigm in engaging consumers through sensitive and circumscribed approaches (Khamis, 2012)


Cadbury 'Eyebrows' Campaign 2009
Cadbury (2009) Untitled. [video online] Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVblWq3tDwY [Accessed: 20 august].



The explosion of new converged media and the technological capabilities of the Internet have forged an environment of consumer sovereignty and participation, that challenges traditional modes of advertising. These new technological avenues however provide commercial and creative opportunities to engages consumers through the use of dominate social medias and networks.




 Mikaela Heise: 42867584.





References:


Deuze, M. (2006). Collaboration, Participation and the Media. New Media and Society. [online] 8(4) pp.691-698. Available at:<http://www29.griffith.edu.au/imersd/draper/music2/collaboration_participation_media.pdf>[Accessed 25th August 2012].


Dwyer, T. (2010). Media ConvergenceBerkshire: McGraw Hill. pp. 1-23.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media CollideNew York: New York University Press. pp. 1-24.

Kiehl, S. (2009) ‘As Journalism remakes itself, students follow’, The Baltimore Sun (Online edition), 31 March. Available at: <http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/education/bal-journalism0331,0,644027.story>[Accessed 24th August].

Negroponte, N. (1995) Being digital, Knopf, New York.

Sheehan, K. and Morrison, D. (2009) Beyond convergence: Confluence culture and the role of the advertising agency in a changing world. [online]. Available at:<http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2239/2121>[Accessed 24th August 2012].

Spurgeon, C. (2008) Advertising and New Media, Oxon: Routledge. pp.24-45.

Watts, D. et al. (2007) Viral Marketing for the Real World. [e-book] Harvard University Press <http://www.itu.dk/people/rkva/2011-Spring-EB22/readings/watts2007_viralmarketing.pdf> [Accessed: 25 august].


Lecture Content:

Khamis, S. (2012) Advertising and New Media, MAS110. Macquarie University, 22nd August 2012.



No comments: